[rabbitmq-discuss] [Minimum Air Induction] Introducing Shovel: An AMQP Relay
matthias at lshift.net
Sun Sep 21 05:07:46 BST 2008
Valentino Volonghi wrote:
> On Sep 20, 2008, at 12:45 PM, Matthias Radestock wrote:
>> Why would the connection be used in bursts?
> This is what I saw on a test. I suppose that's because until the
> transaction is committed shovel doesn't see messages coming
Makes sense. I didn't realise you were talking about the connection to
You can probably get away with much shorter tx sizes than 500, in
exchange for a comparatively small performance penalty of, say, 10%, and
thus make the transmissions less bursty.
More information about the rabbitmq-discuss