[rabbitmq-discuss] until clients support Channel.Flow in 1.5.0+...

[Brian Sullivan]

Is there any reason we *wouldn't* want that behavior?  I might be  
coming from a paranoid place where I fear my ProducersOfDeath, but it  
really seems like a better idea to protect the server from crashing in  
these cases...

This fix is small enough to include in 1.5.0, I hope?

On Nov 20, 2008, at 4:14 PM, Ben Hood wrote:

> Brian
>
> On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 12:02 AM, Brian Sullivan
> <bsullivan at lindenlab.com> wrote:
>>
>> Can we assume that if a client doesn't support Channel.Flow in 1.5.0
>> onwards, that it will get an error from the broker if the client
>> continues to try to send messages?
>
> If the client ignores the server initiated command, then the server
> will just accept this until it dies.
>
> We could fix this, I suppose.
>
> Ben